Technical writing workshops and readability risk assessments for regulated industries.

For 35+ years we’ve trained writers and fixed the systems behind risky documentation. Tell us where it hurts and we’ll start there.

Rated 4.8 out of 5 from 600+ reviews on Reviews.io

Everyone in the boat pulls to the same stroke. That is what a working system looks like.

Apple Fannie Mae Genentech Lowe's Microsoft New York Life Pfizer Raytheon Stryker Travelers

Where to Start

Two ways we help. Start with the problem you have.

“Our team’s writing isn’t where it needs to be.”

Reports bounce back for rewrites. Reviews drag on. Every writer follows a different pattern.

Writing Workshops

Train your team on its own documents.

  • Customized around your SOPs, reports, and proposals, not generic exercises
  • Onsite in 2 to 5 days, or live over video in 2-hour sessions
  • Your team keeps the rewritten examples and the standard behind them

Business Writing Workshops Engineering Writing Workshops Manufacturing Writing Workshops Pharmaceutical Writing Workshops

“We don’t know where our documentation risk is.”

Audits keep finding the same gaps. Procedures get skipped on the floor. Nobody owns the standard.

PROS Readability Risk Assessment®

Measure the system before you fix it.

  • Assesses your systems, processes, and documents, not just the writing
  • Finds missing standards, unclear ownership, and reviews that add risk
  • Starts with the root cause: we trace slow reviews and repeat questions back to your process, tools, or team
  • You get the PROS Roadmap™: findings, prioritized fixes, and steps your team can start this week
  • We walk your stakeholders through it, and the report is yours to keep

“The instructor covers many useful writing skills and concepts. I recommend the course to scientists, engineers, program managers, editors, or anyone who wants to write more persuasively and succinctly.”

William Walters, IDA

Unclear Writing Kills.

We hunt down the risk hiding in your SOPs, protocols, and reports, then build the system that keeps it out. 35+ years implementing the systems that de-risk documentation for regulated, high-stakes teams.

99%

of FDA warning letters sent to regulated labs cite missing or inadequate written procedures. The problem was never bad writing. The procedures were never written down, or never held.

2025 analysis of FDA warning letters (QBench)

80–90%

of serious industrial injuries trace back to human error, and most of those are “unsafe acts,” meaning a worker bypassing a procedure that was unclear, inefficient, or never written.

Safety research and industrial insurance data

18,000

machine-related amputations and crush injuries a year in manufacturing, driven in large part by flawed or missing lockout/tagout procedures, routinely among OSHA’s most-cited violations.

OSHA violation and injury data

41%

of oil and gas fatalities are explosions, fires, and flash burns. Investigators rarely find a random mechanical failure. They find vague or bypassed steps for line purging, hot work, and vessel isolation.

IOGP; U.S. Chemical Safety Board investigations

30%+

of manufacturing fatalities, roughly 105 to 120 deaths a year, are contact incidents traced back to a failure to follow or establish a known safe work procedure.

Academic and insurance case reviews

332,600

workplace injury and illness cases a year in manufacturing alone, alongside 355 to 400 deaths. That is the baseline every procedural gap adds to.

U.S. manufacturing sector reporting

Grammar isn’t the gap. Every tool on your team’s desktop already catches that, and the documents that cause the most damage are usually spotless. Whether the reader does the right thing is a different question, and there’s science on how people read that answers it.

The Assessment

You can’t fix a system you haven’t measured.

Our patented, proprietary PROS Readability Risk Assessment® is an assessment of your systems, your processes, and your documentation. It finds where the standard is missing, where ownership is unclear, and where your review process is adding risk instead of removing it.

We don’t decide the fix before we’ve done the assessment. It might be a standard. It might be a template, a review workflow, or clear ownership at each handoff. Often it’s a workshop, built on your own documents.

Our Workshops

Training won’t hold without a system to hold it.

Most workplace training fails, and not because the training was bad. It fails because people return to an environment that never changed: no standard to apply it against, no reinforcement, and no one accountable for whether it sticks.

Send a team to a generic course with no standard waiting for them and you’ve bought goodwill, not change. Our workshops work the other way around: built on your team’s own documents, tied to the standard they have to hold to, with rewritten examples your writers and reviewers can reuse after we leave.

Further reading: Why most training fails, and how to make yours work, The Decision Lab

Not sure where to start? That’s what the call is for.

Tell us what’s going wrong with your documents. We’ll tell you whether a workshop, the PROS Readability Risk Assessment®, or both will fix it.

No pitch. Leave with a next step.